Flats 6, 9, 10, 11 and 12, 62 Leatherhead Road, Chesington, Surrey KT9 2HY
LON/00AX/LDC/2026/0083 · dispensation from consultation · Kingston upon Thames · decided 3 Sep 2026
The tribunal refused the landlord's application for dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for the proposed decking repairs, finding no adequate evidence of urgency given the delay since the problem was identified in 2024.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation refused |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 5 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The first and second floors comprise twelve flats in a “U” formation
- outcome
the Tribunal refuses dispensation from the consultation requirements in respect of the proposed works to the communal decking area.
- s20
the Tribunal refuses dispensation from the consultation requirements in respect of the proposed works to the communal decking area.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.