Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near PR25 1LF

Flats 6, 8 and 16 Butlers Farm Court, Leyland, Lancashire, PR25 1LF

MAN/30UN/LSC/2018/0095 · service charges · South Ribble · decided 26 Jul 2019

The tribunal ordered the applicant company to pay £490.35 towards the respondents' costs because it acted unreasonably in conducting the tribunal proceedings, mainly by failing to comply with directions.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companySouthern Counties Property Management Ltd
Managing agentPowell and Co Property (Brighton) Limited
BuildingA block · 3 decisions about this building
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeinsurance, legal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe applicant to pay the respondents collectively £490.35 under Rule 13

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

management company
Southern Counties Property Management
agent
Mr [name], of [name] and Co Property (Brighton) Limited denies
outcome
makes an order for costs in favour of the Respondents collectively under
costs
in an amount of £490.35, to be paid by the Applicant.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.