Flats 4-44 Powhay Mills, Tudor Street, Exeter, devon, EX4 3BT
HAV/18UC/LDC/2024/0621 · dispensation from consultation · Exeter · decided 1 Dec 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements to install a drive unit upgrade to the lift serving flats 4 to 16 at Powhay Mills, because the work was urgent and no leaseholder objected or showed prejudice.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Grays Inn Capital Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Belmont Management Services (South West) Limited |
| Building | A block, 41 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Applicant says that the Property is a purpose built block of 41 flats.
- freeholder
Applicant : Grays Inn Capital Limited
- agent
Representative : Belmont Management Services (South West) Limited
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements
- s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.