Flats 3, 4, 4a, 5 and 6 York House, 9 Rotton Park Road, Birmingham, B16 9JH
BIR/00CN/LBC/2024/0003 · breach of lease · Birmingham · decided 29 May 2024
The Tribunal found that the Second Respondent breached lease covenant 1 by permitting short-term paid lettings (including Airbnb) of Flats 3, 5 and 6 since 2016 and of Flat 4a on four occasions since 2020, found no breach for Flat 4, and found a possible breach of covenant 2 in 2024 through Airbnb letting.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 9 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
five of the nine flats which are let on long residential leases
- outcome
In respect of Flats 3, 5, and 6, we find that since 2016 (i.e. the last eight years), the Second Respondent
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.