Flats 23, 27a & 29 Tarring Road, Worthing, BN11 4EP
CHI/45UH/LRM/2023/0006 · right to manage · Worthing · decided 17 Jan 2024
The Tribunal determined that the Tarring Road RTM Company was entitled on the relevant date to acquire the right to manage the premises, rejecting the counter notice's objections, and is minded to order the first respondent to reimburse £100 in fees.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Tarring Road RTM Company Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the first respondent to reimburse the applicant application fees of £100 within 28 days |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The freehold title was registered at HM Land Registry in the name of the second Respondent, Littlehampton Properties Ltd
- management company
Applicant : Tarring Road RTM Company Limited
- outcome
the Applicant was on the relevant date entitled to acquire the right to manage the premises known as flats 23, 27a and 29 Tarring Rd
- costs
the first Respondent reimburse the Applicant fees of £100 within 28 days from the date of this decision
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.