Flats 17 and 25, First Floor 25 Sea Road, East Preston, Littlehampton, West Sussex, BN16 1JN
CHI/45UC/LBC/2021/0005 · breach of lease · Arun · decided 10 Aug 2021
The tribunal found that the leaseholder of flat 17 breached several lease covenants, including by erecting a fence, lighting a fire on the roof, parking in the rear access road and keeping a dog without consent, and that the leaseholder of flat 25 breached the covenant against nuisance and illegal use by allowing drug cultivation at the flat, while the window allegations failed and a section 20C order was made limited to £500 for each leaseholder.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Manorground Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The Applicant landlord is the freeholder of the premises known as Flats
- outcome
is or has been in breach of clauses 3(8)(a), 3(9)(a), 3(9)(o) and
- s20c
The Tribunal makes an order in favour of [name]
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.