Flats 11 & 12 Ingram Lodge, 80 Kings Avenue, London SW4 8BJ
LON/00AY/LSC/2025/0992 · service charges · Lambeth · decided 29 Apr 2026
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the proposed chemical damp proof course works were not appropriate, so their cost is not payable, leaving only £6,600 of the £60,000 budgeted for major works payable by the applicants, and made orders preventing the landlord's tribunal costs being passed to the leaseholders.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Ingram Lodgers Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Prime Property Management |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2024, 2025 |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | major works, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £6,600 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent may not pass its costs of the tribunal proceedings through the service charge or as an administration cha |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : The Ingram Lodgers Ltd
- agent
Prime Property Management had written to the Tribunal and the applicants to say they acted for the respondent
- years
in the service charge years 2024 and 2025
- outcome
the applicants are only liable for their respective shares of £6,600
- items reduced
the proposed chemical DPC works are not appropriate. The costs of those works is therefore neither reasonable nor payable.
- total demanded
the budgeted costs of the works have been demanded of the leaseholders at the building
- total payable
the applicants are only liable for their respective shares of £6,600
- s20c
the tribunal nonetheless determines that it is just and equitable in the circumstances for an order to be made under section 20C of the 1985 Act
- costs
so that none of the landlord’s costs of the tribunal proceedings may be passed to the lessees through any service charge or as an administration charge
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.