Flats 11-15 Galsworthy House, 7-8 New Parade, Dorking, RH4 1RE
CHI/43UE/LDC/2022/0111 · dispensation from consultation · Mole Valley · decided 25 Jan 2023
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent works to stop water ingress into two flats, finding leaseholders would suffer no relevant prejudice.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Balandra Securities Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
five purpose built two to three bedroom flats on the first and second floors
- outcome
The Tribunal grants an order dispensing with the consultation requirements in respect of the works to remedy the substantial water ingress in the flats of the two leaseholders.
- s20
The Tribunal grants an order dispensing with the consultation requirements in respect of the works to remedy the substantial water ingress in the flats of the two leaseholders.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.