Flats 1 to 8, Sussex Court, Emerald Quay, Shoreham-By-Sea, West Sussex, BN43 5EW
HAV/45UB/LDC/2025/0754 · dispensation from consultation · Adur · decided 10 Feb 2026
The tribunal granted the management company dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent roofing works at this eight-flat block, finding that the leaseholders could not show prejudice because none objected.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Adur Property Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is described as a purpose built block housing eight flats.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for the dispensation of all or any of the consultation requirements
- s20
It is evident that a statutorily compliant consultation has not been carried out by the Applicant.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.