Flats 1 to 7, 22a Huntington Road, York YO31 8RD
MAN/00FF/LDC/2024/0009 · dispensation from consultation · York · decided 24 May 2024
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs and related works carried out between November 2023 and January 2024, while leaving leaseholders free to challenge the costs later.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Mulberry PM Ltd |
| Building | One flat, 7 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
the Property comprises a converted property containing 7 flats
- agent
Representative : Mulberry PM Ltd
- years
undertaken between November 2023 and January 2024
- outcome
The Tribunal grants unconditional dispensation from the consultation requirements imposed by Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal grants unconditional dispensation from the consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.