Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near MK11 4AU

Flats 1 and 9, 4 Cicero Crescent and 2 Titus Court, Fairfields, Milton Keynes, MK11 4AU/4AS

CAM/00MG/LSC/2025/0651 · service charges · Milton Keynes · decided 12 Jan 2026

The tribunal found that the building and terrorism insurance premiums charged by the landlord's company for 2024 and 2025 were reasonably incurred and payable, and made no section 20C order or fee refund order.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Refused
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentHomeground Management Limited
BuildingA block, 9 flats
Service charge years in dispute2024, 2025
Items in disputeinsurance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
with the Respondent’s cover for Flats 1-9, 4 Cicero Crescent
freeholder
The Respondent, [name] Land 3 Limited, was the freeholder of Flats 1
agent
was the Respondent’s appointed asset manager and agent.
years
for the service charge years 2024 and 2025.
outcome
The Tribunal determines that the sums charged for insurance for 2024
s20c
The Tribunal does not make an order under section 20C of the Landlord

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.