Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SE10 8BH

Flats 1 & 2 Hermes Court, 273 Greenwich High Road, SE10 8BH

LON/00AL/LDC/2021/0053 · dispensation from consultation · Greenwich · decided 2 Aug 2023

The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent smoke vent renewal works at a two-flat building, while stating that leaseholders can still challenge the cost and payability of the charges.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordFreehold Mangers (Nominees) Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Applicant : [name] (Nominees) Ltd
outcome
The tribunal determines that retrospective dispensation should be given from the consultation requirements in respect of the proposed works to renew the smoke vents
s20
the Tribunal makes an order that the consultation requirements are retrospectively dispensed in respect of the Smoke Vent Renewal Works at the Property

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.