Flats 1-9 Elms Place, 8 Elms Road, Oxford OX2 9JZ
CAM/38UE/LDC/2025/0690 · dispensation from consultation · Vale of White Horse · decided 8 Jan 2026
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for works to remove and store solar panels to investigate a roof leak into Flat 7.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Long Term Reversions (Harrogate) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Warwick Estates Property Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 9 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
consist of 9 flats
- freeholder
Long Term Reversions (Harrogate) Limited are substituted as the
- agent
Warwick Estates Property Management Limited applied for
- outcome
The tribunal determines under section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 to dispense with all the consultation requirements
- s20
to dispense with all the consultation requirements in relation to the works described in the application form
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.