Flats 1-9, Beechcroft Place, 29 Eastbury Ave, Northwood, Hertfordshire, HA6 3JS
CAM/26UJ/LDC/2021/0038 · dispensation from consultation · Three Rivers · decided 4 Jan 2022
The tribunal granted the landlord retrospective dispensation from all statutory consultation requirements for replacing the electric gate motors, because the gates posed a security risk and no leaseholder opposed the application or showed prejudice.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Beechcroft Place Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | HML Group |
| Building | A block, 9 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
purpose built block of 9 flats
- freeholder
Applicant : Beechcroft Place Ltd
- agent
Representative : HML Group (Managing Agents)
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that an order for dispensation under section 20ZA of the 1985 Act shall be made dispensing with all consultation requirements.
- s20
The Tribunal determines that an order for dispensation under section 20ZA of the 1985 Act shall be made dispensing with all consultation requirements.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.