Flats 1-8 Shirrel Court, Tower Close, Gosport, PO12 2TY
CHI/24UF/LDC/2020/0031 · dispensation from consultation · Gosport · decided 20 May 2020
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the final stage of the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs at Shirrel Court, while making no finding on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Proxim Property Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Flats 1-8 Shirrel Court, Tower Close, Gosport
- agent
Representative : Proxim Property Management Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal decides to dispense with the consultation requirements final stage of the consultation process for the works specified because the [name] would suffer no relevant prejudice.
- s20
The Tribunal decides to dispense with the consultation requirements final stage of the consultation process for the works specified because the [name] would suffer no relevant prejudice.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.