Flats 1-70 Wimbledon Hall, 3 Derby Road, Bournemouth, BH1 3PP

CHI/00HN/LIS/2018/0023 · LIS · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 11 Mar 2019

figures not yet checked

The Tribunal found the estimated major works roofing and insulated panel costs reasonable to demand on account, but allowed the 15% management fee only on the net cost rather than the VAT-inclusive cost, and ordered that the landlord's costs of the proceedings cannot be charged to the service charge.

Outcome	Reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Landlord or management company
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	A block, 70 flats
Service charge years in dispute	2019, 2020
Items in dispute	major works, management fees
Items disallowed or reduced	management fees
Total demanded	£616,516.41
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: The Property comprises 70 flats, of which 22
years: the costs are to be split over the service charge years 2019 and 2020
outcome: the 15% is applicable only to the net estimated cost of the major works
items reduced: the 15% is applicable only to the net estimated cost of the major works
total demanded: £616,516.41 & 15% management fees
s20c: makes a formal determination that none of the Applicant`s costs

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.