Flats 1-65 Leith Towers, Grange Vale, Brighton Road, Sutton SM2 5BY
LON/00BF/LDC/2022/0081 · dispensation from consultation · Sutton · decided 20 Jul 2022
The Tribunal granted the applicant dispensation from the Section 20 consultation requirements for urgent fire safety works at the building, while stating that the reasonableness of any service charge costs remains open to challenge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Leith Towers Management Limited |
| Managing agent | Directors of Leith Towers Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 65 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
containing 65 self-contained dwellings
- management company
Applicant : Leith Towers Management Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal determines to allow this application to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal determines to allow this application to dispense with the consultation requirements imposed by Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.