Flats 1-6 46 St James Rd, Sutton, Surrey SM1 2TN
LON/00BF/LSC/2021/0243 · service charges · Sutton · decided 4 Nov 2022
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal allowed most of the service charges for 2018 to 2021 but reduced insurance, drains, cleaning, gardening, window cleaning and some estimates, and prevented the landlord recovering its costs of the case through the service charge.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | cleaning and grounds, insurance, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Flats 1-6 46 St [name], Sutton, SM1 2TN
- freeholder
Respondents : Assethold Ltd/ Eagestates
- years
The Applicants seek a determination in relation to the years 2018 to 2021.
- outcome
The tribunal disallows all of the drain costs over the three years save for £402 pounds which related to the initial clearance of the tree roots.
- items reduced
The tribunal disallows all of the drain costs over the three years save for £402 pounds which related to the initial clearance of the tree roots.
- s20c
The Tribunal will exercise its discretion and prevent the Respondents from recovering their costs from the service charges.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.