Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near GU8 5HJ

Flats 1-5 Milford House,Portsmouth Road,Milford,Godalming GU8 5HJ

HAV/43UL/LDC/2025/0631 · dispensation from consultation · Waverley · decided 15 Jul 2025

The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent roofing repairs to prevent water ingress into a flat, leaving the reasonableness of the costs to a separate application.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordMilford St James Residents Company Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentWarwick Estates
BuildingA block, 5 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
housing 5 leasehold apartments
freeholder
Milford St [name] Company Limited
agent
Representative : Warwick Estates
outcome
The Tribunal determines that dispensation is granted under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 for the roofing works to be carried out to the property.
s20
dispensation from the consultation requirements in Section 20 of the Act is granted

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.