Flats 1, 4 & 5, 333 Clapham Road, Stockwell, London SW9 9BS
LON/00AY/LDC/2021/0250 · dispensation from consultation · Lambeth · decided 10 Jan 2022
The tribunal refused the landlord's application for retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for flat roof works completed in 2017, because the consultation failures prejudiced the lessees and the earlier decision already limited one lessee's charge to £250.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 5 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
where there are 5 flats
- years
On or about 2nd March 2017 the Applicant completed works to the flat roof area
- outcome
for dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements in respect of works to the subject property is refused
- s20
The Tribunal is satisfied that the Applicant failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements in respect of all 3 Respondents
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.