Flats 1-4, 23 Devonshire Road, Bexhill On Sea, East Sussex, TN40 1AH
CHI/21UG/LDC/2023/0028 · dispensation from consultation · Rother · decided 6 Apr 2023
The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for replacing the front flat roof, but refused dispensation for the internal decoration of the ground floor shop because it is not recoverable through the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Holdmanor Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Oakfield PM Ltd |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a converted building of 4 flats and 1 commercial unit over 4 levels
- freeholder
Applicant : Holdmanor Ltd
- agent
Representative : Oakfield PM Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal therefore grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of replacing the front flat roof.
- s20
The Tribunal therefore grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of replacing the front flat roof.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.