Flats 1 - 3, 9 Guildford Street, London, WC1N 1DT
LON/00AG/LSC/2026/0049 · service charges · Camden · decided 27 Jul 2026
The parties agreed that the Reserve Fund service charge demands for 2021 to 2025 were payable and reasonable, and the Tribunal made a section 20C order in the leaseholders' favour, so the landlord cannot recover its costs of the case through the service charge and gets no refund of its tribunal fees.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Lyceum Limited |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 |
| Items in dispute | reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | no order for applicant to recover tribunal fees |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
Lyceum Limited, Managing Agent
- years
relating to the Reserve Fund demands for service charge years 2020 to 2025
- outcome
the outstanding Service Charge demands for YE 2021 to YE 2025 were payable and were reasonable in amount
- s20c
The Tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in the Respondents’ favour
- costs
makes no order in the Applicant’s favour in respect of the tribunal fees
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.