Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near B3 1RW

Flats 1 - 29 Midland Court 39 Cox Street St Paul's Square Birmingham B3 1RW

BIR/00CN/LDC/2024/0621 · dispensation from consultation · Birmingham · decided 23 Apr 2025

The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof and guttering repair works, finding that leaseholders would suffer no relevant prejudice; the decision does not decide whether the costs are reasonable or payable.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordMidland Heart Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 29 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
Flats 1 - 29 Midland Court 39 Cox Street
freeholder
Applicant : Midland Heart Ltd
outcome
Dispensation to the consultation procedures set out in section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is hereby granted.
s20
Dispensation to the consultation procedures set out in section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is hereby granted.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.