Flats 1-24 The Wedge, Vernon Road, Nottingham, NG6 0AU
BIR/00FY/LDC/2021/0010 · dispensation from consultation · Nottingham · decided 8 Jul 2021
The Tribunal granted the applicant management company dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements to replace the fire alarm system, because the works were urgently needed for safety and no respondent objected; the decision does not decide whether the costs are payable or reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Nottingham Wedge Property Management Company Limited |
| Managing agent | Mapperley Property Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 23 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
in total 23 one and two bedroomed flats
- management company
Applicant : Nottingham Wedge Property Management Company Limited
- outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of section 20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Applicant has not consulted with the Respondents.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.