Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near NN2 7JW

Flats 1-24 Phippsville Court,St Matthews Parade, Northampton NN2 7JW

CAM/34UF/LDC/2024/0606 · dispensation from consultation · West Northamptonshire · decided 11 Apr 2025

The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the urgent roof repair works at this 24-flat block, but only for the works described in the application and the three estimates provided.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordCovent Garden Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 24 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe applicant to meet its own costs of the application

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
Purpose built block of 24 flats.
freeholder
Landlords : Covent Garden Ltd
outcome
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements on the applicant
s20
The Tribunal grants dispensation from the requirements on the applicant
costs
The applicant will meet all of its costs arising from the making and determination of this application.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.