Flats 1-230 Scotney Gardens, Maidstone, Kent, ME16 0GT
CHI/29UH/LDC/2023/0117 · dispensation from consultation · Maidstone · decided 16 Feb 2024
The Tribunal granted dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the 2013 and 2016 management contracts with Peco, conditional on the decision being sent to all leaseholders, and made no finding on whether the charges are payable or reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Scotney Gardens RTM Management Company Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Peco Flat Management |
| Building | A block, 230 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | management fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property was a development in Maidstone consisting of 230 flats.
- freeholder
Applicant : Scotney Gardens RTM Management
- agent
the second in 2016 [48] to Peco Flat Management.
- outcome
we find that we should grant dispensation conditional upon a copy of this decision being provided to all the leaseholders.
- s20
It was accepted that no consultation had been undertaken
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.