Flats 1-20 Hampton Court, Brighton Road, Worthing, West Sussex BN11 2EF
CHI/45UH/LAM/2020/0007 · appointment of a manager · Worthing · decided 7 Sep 2020
The tribunal appointed an independent manager of this 20-flat block for three years from 5 October 2020, with a restriction protecting the manager's position against future sales of the freehold, and found the landlord cannot recover its legal costs of the application through the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Rushcavern Limited |
| Management company | Kirkland Investment Management Limited |
| Managing agent | Helm Estate Services Limited |
| Building | A block, 20 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
purpose-built block comprising 20 flats plus a utility room
- freeholder
The Respondent is the freeholder of the property
- agent
The property is currently managed by Helm Estate Services Limited
- outcome
appointed as Manager of the Property known as Flats 1-20
- s20c
Given this finding there is no ground for making an order under section 20C of the 1985 Act
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.