Flats 1, 2, 3, 14 Lingfield Road Wimbledon London SW19 4QA
LON/00BA/LBC/2019/0086 · breach of lease · Merton · decided 21 Jan 2020
The Tribunal found that the leaseholder breached the licence for alterations by failing to make good damage and pay costs, and breached the lease by letting without a deed of covenant, but dismissed the dog-keeping allegation and found no breach over the CDM documents or the section 146 costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Lingfield Road Maintenance Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that there has been a breach of covenants/condition of the Respondent’s lease as set out below.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.