Flats 1, 1A -10 Steepleview, 50 London Road, Grays, Essex, RM17 5XY
CAM/00KG/LDC/2023/0017 · dispensation from consultation · Thurrock · decided 3 May 2023
The tribunal granted the RTM company dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent roof repair works at the building, while leaving any future challenge to the charges open under section 27A.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Steepleview RTM Co. |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 11 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising a building of 11 units, let out on long leases
- management company
Steepleview RTM Co.
- outcome
The tribunal dispenses with all the consultation requirements to rectify the problems with the building referred to in the application
- s20
dispensation is granted pursuant to section 20ZA of the 1985 Act
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 3 May 2023.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.