Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near LS17 6UZ

Flats 1-19, 20 Falkland Rise, Leeds, LS17 6UZ

MAN/00DA/LDC/2020/0029 · dispensation from consultation · Leeds · decided 22 Feb 2021

The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent roof replacement works at 20 Falklands Rise, while stating that the reasonableness and payability of the resulting service charges remain open for later challenge.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordTay Court (Falklands) Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentInspired Property Management
BuildingA block, 18 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputerepairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
consisting of 18 apartments
agent
Applicant’s Representative : Inspired Property Management
outcome
The Tribunal is satisfied that it is reasonable to dispense with the consultation requirements.
s20
Those parts of the statutory consultation requirements relating to the works which have not been complied with are to be dispensed with.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.