Flats 1-15 Sackett House, Cowley Road, London SW9 6HF
LON/00AY/LDC/2020/0144 · dispensation from consultation · Lambeth · decided 2 Dec 2020
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the leak repair and pipe relay works to the water supply at Sackett House, costing £33,391.75, finding no prejudice to leaseholders from the lack of consultation.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 15 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £33,391.75 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a 1930’s Local Authority built 5-storey building with 15 self-contained flats
- years
on or around the 26th June 2019 a water leak was reported
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that dispensation should be given from all the consultation requirements
- total demanded
The agreed cost of the works is £33,391.75 inclusive of VAT.
- s20
dispensation should be given from all the consultation requirements in respect of the works
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.