Flats 1-15 Russell Court, 5 Frederick Street, Aldershot, GU11 1AX
HAV/24UL/LDC/2026/0072 · dispensation from consultation · Rushmoor · decided 21 Jul 2026
The tribunal granted dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for the £9,420 emergency scaffolding works and pavement licence at the building, finding no tenant was prejudiced by the failure to consult.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Russell Court (Aldershot) Management Company |
| Management company | Russell Court (Aldershot) Management Company |
| Managing agent | Chaneys Chartered Surveyors |
| Building | A block, 14 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £9,420 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a 4-storey block of 14 flats with commercial units
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] Court (Aldershot) Management
- agent
Representative : [name]
- outcome
The Tribunal therefore orders under s.20ZA LTA 1985 that the consultation requirements of Pt.2 Sch.4 to the 2001 regulations are dispensed with.
- total demanded
Cost for scaffold and licence is £9,420.
- s20
the consultation requirements of Pt.2 Sch.4 to the 2001 regulations are dispensed with
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.