Flats 1-14, 234 Dalston Lane, London, E8 1LA
LON/00AM/LSC/2024/0353 · service charges · Hackney · decided 10 Mar 2025
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal decided that the 2024 interim service charge of £218,390.02 for the section 20 consultation works is payable and reasonable, and that the difference from the later consultation figure did not make it unreasonable.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Bailey Property Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 14 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2024 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £218,390.02 |
| Total found payable | £218,390.02 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
lessees of flats 1-14, 234 Dalston Lane
- agent
Bailey Property Management Limited
- years
the service charge year 2024
- outcome
is payable and reasonable.
- total demanded
£218,390.02 demanded in respect of the section 20
- total payable
£218,390.02 demanded in respect of the section 20
- s20c
No application was made by the Respondent with regards to s20C of
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.