Flats 1 – 14, 105 Pritchard’s Road, London E2 9AW
LON/00AM/LDC/2020/0068 · dispensation from consultation · Hackney · decided 10 Aug 2020
The tribunal dispensed with the section 20 consultation requirements so that the external wall covering/cladding testing by SFI Ltd at a cost of £3,500 could go ahead without full consultation.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 14 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Flats 1 – 14, 105 Pritchard’s Road,
- outcome
For each of the following reasons I dispense with the consultation requirements provided by Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985,
- s20
For each of the following reasons I dispense with the consultation requirements provided by Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985,
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.