Flats 1-112, 2 Navigation Street, Leicester, LE1 3UJ
BIR/00FN/LDC/2021/0008 · dispensation from consultation · Leicester · decided 28 Jul 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent concrete and balcony repairs at Thames Tower, finding leaseholders would be prejudiced by delay, but it did not decide whether the costs are reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Premier Ground Rents No 5 Limited |
| Management company | Thames Tower Management Company Ltd |
| Managing agent | Pinnacle Property Management Ltd |
| Building | A block, 112 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprises of 112 self-contained flats
- freeholder
Respondent 2 : Premier Ground Rents No 5 Limited
- management company
Applicant : Thames Tower Management Company Ltd
- agent
Applicant’s Representative : Pinnacle Property Management Ltd
- outcome
the Tribunal grants the dispensation requested under Section 20ZA
- s20
Accordingly, the Tribunal grants the dispensation requested under Section 20ZA and determines accordingly.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.