Flat O Welford House 114 Shirland Road W9 2BT
LON/00BK/LSC/2023/0128 · service charges · Westminster · decided 20 Oct 2023
The tribunal determined the respondent's service charges payable for the years 2021, 2022 and 2023, including the major works contribution, with his share calculated at 5.65% of the residential and shared costs, and found them reasonable and payable.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Croker Clifford LLP |
| Building | One flat, 16 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021, 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, insurance, major works, management fees, other, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprising two blocks with a total of 16 flats
- agent
[name] Clifford LLP are the managing agents.
- years
the service charge years ended 31 December 2021 and 2022 and the amounts demanded in respect of the service charge year ending 31 December 2023
- outcome
are both reasonable and payable.
- s20
A dispensation was obtained pursuant to section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in relation to the consultation requirements for these works.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.