Flat E, 5 Kensington Court, W8 5DL
LON/00AW/LSC/2024/0100 · service charges · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 26 Jun 2024
The tribunal decided that the £22,334.63 of service charges claimed, mainly for the roof replacement and external repairs, are reasonable and payable by the leaseholder of Flat E.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 7 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £22,334.63 |
| Total found payable | £22,334.63 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
is a terraced building containing seven flats
- years
£489.99 Quarterly Service Charge December 2022
- outcome
are reasonable in amount and are payable by the Respondent
- total demanded
The Service Charges claimed in the County Court proceedings amounting to £22,334.63
- total payable
The Service Charges claimed in the County Court proceedings amounting to £22,334.63 are reasonable in amount and are payable by the Respondent
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.