Flat B, 105 Dagnall Park Road, London, SE25 6NS
LON/00AH/LSC/2020/0036 · service charges · Croydon · decided 8 Apr 2021
The tribunal found service charges of £4,711.79 for 2016 to 2018 payable by the respondent, and the county court awarded interest of £1,084.72 and indemnity costs of £12,964.60 against him.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | major works, legal and professional fees, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £4,711.79 |
| Total found payable | £4,711.79 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant's assessed costs of £12,964.60 on an indemnity basis |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
service charge period 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018
- outcome
service charges in the sum of £4,711.79 for the service charge period 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018 are payable by the respondent
- total demanded
service charges in the sum of £4,711.79
- total payable
service charges in the sum of £4,711.79 for the service charge period 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2018 are payable by the respondent
- costs
The Defendant to pay the Claimant’s assessed costs in the sum of £12,964.60
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.