Flat 92 Parke Lorne, 111 Park Road, London NW8 7JL
LON/00BK/LSC/2019/0377 · service charges · Westminster · decided 12 Mar 2020
The tribunal disallowed the cost of Flat 52 leak works, the head porter role and basement flat refurbishment, unconsulted gutter and car park works above £250, and printing costs, and capped the management fee at £500 per lessee per year, reduced wages by 25%, and ordered the landlord to reimburse the fees and not add its costs to the service charge.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Tanderra Holdings Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 17 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2017, 2018, 2019 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | administration charges, major works, management fees, other |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the applicant the application and hearing fees |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a purpose-built block of 17 residential flats
- freeholder
Respondent : Tanderra Holdings Limited
- years
the service charge years 2017, 2018 and the estimated charges in 2019
- outcome
The tribunal disallows the 2017 cost of the works to Flat 52 in connection with the leak
- items reduced
The tribunal disallows the costs of major works to the gutters and car park ceiling to the extent they exceed £250.
- s20c
it is reasonable to make an order under section 20C of the 1985 thereby limiting the respondent from adding the costs of this application to the applicant’s service charge.
- s20
The tribunal finds and the respondent accepts that there was no section 20 consultation carried out
- costs
direct the respondent to reimburse the applicant the amounts of the application and the hearing fees
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.