Flat 91, Hermitage Court, London, E1W 1PW
LON/00BG/LAC/2023/0024 · administration charges · Tower Hamlets · decided 2 Dec 2024
The tribunal dismissed the landlord's application for a costs order against the leaseholder, finding he had not acted unreasonably in the proceedings.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, repairs and maintenance, legal and professional fees, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- outcome
The Respondent’s application for an order for costs pursuant to rule 13(1)(b)(ii) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013 is dismissed.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 10 Jun 2024, 10 Jun 2024.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.