FLAT 9, PENNINGTON COURT, 245 ROTHERHITHE STREET, LONDON, SE16 5FT
LON/00BE/LBC/2025/0665 · breach of lease · Southwark · decided 16 Feb 2026
The Tribunal found that the leaseholder breached the lease by erecting a stud wall to create a third bedroom without the landlord's licence, as his without prejudice letter was not a valid application for consent, and refused his request for orders limiting the landlord's costs.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 66 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees, administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | legal and professional fees, administration charges |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Building contains 66 flats including Flat 9, Pennington Court
- outcome
(1) The Tribunal determines pursuant to section 168(4) of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 that, in breach of clause 3.1 and paragraph 9 of the Third Schedule to the Lease of the Property
- s20c
(2) The Respondent’s application for an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 is dismissed.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.