Flat 9 Kernella Court, 51-53 Surrey Road, Bournemouth, BH4 9HS

CHI/00HN/LSC/2020/0016 · service charges · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 2 Jun 2021

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the leaseholders liable to pay the £60 and £150 late payment administration charges and the driveway service charge, found the section 20 notices complied with the Act, and made no s.20C order or costs order, but did not allow the £500 roof increase because the required auditor's certificate had not been obtained.

Outcome	Payable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Refused
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	Kernella Court Management Company Limited
Managing agent	Initiative Property Management
Building	One flat
Service charge years in dispute	2019, 2020
Items in dispute	administration charges, major works, reserve fund
Items disallowed or reduced	none stated
Total demanded	£2,736.71
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	each party to bear its own costs

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

management company: Respondent : Kernella Court Management Company Limited
agent: Representative : Initiative Property Management
years: a service charge demanded on account on 10th July 2019 in the sum of £2736.71 in relation to the cost of driveway works carried out in late 2020.
outcome: the Tribunal finds that the Applicants are liable to pay the charges of £60 and £150 both in connection with the late payment of the service charge
total demanded: the sum of £2,736.71 being the Applicants share of the resurfacing costs of the driveway and car park at the complex
s20c: the Tribunal considers it just and equitable to make no order under s.20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
costs: the Tribunal makes no order for costs and each party should bear its own costs in respect of this Application

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.