Flat 9, 171 Tower Bridge Road, London, SE1 2AW
LON/00BE/LRM/2024/0016 · right to manage · Southwark · decided 10 Oct 2024
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal dismissed the right to manage application after the applicants withdrew their notice of claim, and it declined to impose the applicants' proposed withdrawal conditions because liability for the respondent's costs arises under section 88 of the 2002 Act rather than from a tribunal order.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Assethold Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Assethold Limited
- outcome
Upon receiving and consenting to the Applicants’ notice of withdrawal dated 9th July 2024 the application is dismissed.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.