Flat 84 Park West, Edgeware Road, London, W2 2QJ
LON/00BK/LSC/2025/1230 · service charges · Westminster · decided 5 May 2026
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal decided that a £1989 charge demanded from the leaseholder as legal costs is not payable or reasonable, because no invoice or evidence of solicitors' work was produced.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Daejan Investments Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | legal and professional fees |
| Total demanded | £1,989 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The freeholder of both properties is Daejan Investments Limited whose managing agents are Highcorn Company Limited.
- agent
whose managing agents are Highcorn Company Limited.
- outcome
The sum of £1989 is not payable or reasonable.
- items reduced
The sum of £1989 is not payable or reasonable.
- total demanded
The Applicant is challenging a single charge made to him by the Respondent for the sum of £1989 attributable to Flat 84.
- total payable
The sum of £1989 is not payable or reasonable.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.