Flat 84 Beauchamp House, Greyfriars Road, Coventry, CV1 3RX
BIR/00CQ/LSC/2024/0628 · service charges · Coventry · decided 25 Jun 2026
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal found the 2022 lighting works were a single set of works that should have been consulted on, so lessees' contribution is limited to £250 each, the 2023/24 surplus should have been credited to lessees rather than moved to reserves, reserve funds should have earned interest, and the Metro PM management agreement was not a qualifying long-term agreement.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Consultation failure found |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Beauchamp House RTM Limited |
| Management company | Beauchamp House RTM Limited |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 136 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024 |
| Items in dispute | major works, management fees, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | major works, reserve fund |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a development of 136 residential flats in Coventry
- freeholder
Respondent : Beauchamp House RTM Limited
- years
in each of 2020/21, 2021/22, 2022/23, and 2023/24, and to the budgeted service charge in 2024/25
- outcome
the sum payable by the Applicants for them is limited to £250.00
- items reduced
the sum payable by the Applicants for them is limited to £250.00
- s20c
We therefore make the costs orders requested.
- s20
Mr [name] accepted that there had been no consultation as required under section 20 of the Act on the lighting works.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.