Flat 8, 85 Holland Road, London, W14 8HP
LON/00AW/LBC/2024/0606 · breach of lease · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 17 Mar 2025
The Tribunal found that the leaseholder of Flat 8 breached several covenants in the lease, including over access for repairs, the roof terrace, nuisance and insurance, and ordered her to pay the landlord's tribunal fees.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Holland Park Investments Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Red Carpet Estates |
| Building | One flat, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to pay the applicant's tribunal application and hearing fees within 28 days |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Building was comprised of 8 flats.
- freeholder
Applicant : Holland Park Investments Ltd
- agent
the Applicant’s managing agent, Red Carpet Estates
- outcome
the Tribunal finds that the Respondent has breached clauses 3(6), 4(4), 4(5) of the Lease
- costs
the Respondent must pay the Applicant’s Tribunal fees in full, that is the application and hearing fee.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.