Flat 8, 790 High Road, Finchley, London, N12 9QR
LON/00AC/LDC/2024/0136 · dispensation from consultation · Barnet · decided 30 Sep 2024
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for emergency roof repairs carried out in 2022, without deciding whether the cost is reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Jermyn Street Properties Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Universal Properties Limited |
| Building | One flat, 8 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £3,263.10 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprised of 8 residential flats and commercial premises on the ground floor
- freeholder
Jermyn Street Properties Limited
- agent
managing agent is Universal Properties Limited
- years
the roof works carried out in 2022
- outcome
The Tribunal granted the application for the following main reasons:
- total demanded
The Respondent’s service charge contribution is placed at £3,263.10.
- s20
The Tribunal granted the application for the following main reasons:
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.