Flat 8, 72 Eaton Square, London SW1W 9AS
LON/00BK/LSC/2019/0017 · service charges · Westminster · decided 5 Jun 2019
The Tribunal found it had jurisdiction only over the 2014 charges, the 2017 special levy and the legal costs, and found all of those charges payable in full, with any section 20C costs application still to be decided.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused (from the later costs ruling on this case, linked below) |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | 72 Eaton Square Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 |
| Items in dispute | legal and professional fees, reserve fund, utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : 72 Eaton Square Limited
- years
The Applicant's challenge is to various service charge items in respect of the service charge years 2009 to 2017.
- outcome
Those service charge items in respect of which the Tribunal has jurisdiction to make a determination are all payable in full.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
Later rulings on the same case (costs, section 20C, permission to appeal): 27 Aug 2019.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.