Flat 71 King Henrys Reach, Manbre Road, London W6 9RH
LON/00AN/LSC/2023/0093 · service charges · Hammersmith and Fulham · decided 23 Jul 2024
The tribunal found the reserve fund, management fees, insurance, cleaning, gardening and administration charges reasonable and payable, ordered a refund of £216.19 that the landlord conceded was unsupported by invoices, and refused the s.20C order.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Sigma Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Burlington Estates |
| Building | One flat, 83 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, management fees, other, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £7,908.30 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
a building containing 83 residential units across 10 blocks
- freeholder
with the name of the landlord Sigma Limited
- agent
Burlington Estates (managing agent and
- years
The actual service charges incurred from 24 June 2021 to 23
- outcome
less the sum of £216.19, which was conceded by
- total demanded
totalling £7,908.30 of which
- s20c
The tribunal refuses the application and declines to
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.