Flat 7, York House, 17 – 19 Park Street West, Luton, Beds LU1 3BE
CAM/000KA/LSC/2020/0047 · service charges · Luton · decided 18 May 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the major works charge of £10,146.09 payable by the leaseholders, including the percentage share, professional fees and contingency, and refused a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | B Bailey & Co Ltd |
| Building | One flat, 14 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, major works, management fees, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £10,146.09 |
| Total found payable | £10,146.09 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
containing 14 flats
- agent
Representative : Mr [name] MRICS of B Bailey & C Ltd
- outcome
The tribunal determines that the sum of £10,146.09 is payable by the
- total demanded
the sum of £10,146.09 is payable by the
- total payable
the sum of £10,146.09 is payable by the
- s20c
The tribunal does not make an order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (the Act).
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.